“College callgirl?”
He approached me on a crowded street corner with an inquisitive look, and since his high-def, cropped picture had led me to expect someone 30 years younger, I was almost thrown off. I managed to keep my sense of sex professionalism intact even as I noticed his ill-fitting sweatpants paired with mandals.
It wasn’t a requirement that I be sexually attracted to my clients, but part of the joy of the Internet was that I could afford to be selective. If I didn’t like the look of somebody, I could make them disappear with just a click of the mouse. Since my standards are a bit quirky, that power of choice didn’t translate to a bunch of hot, young studs, but it did mean that I didn’t have to have sex with anyone totally gruesome. But now that this guy was standing in front of me looking nothing like how I expected him to look, there was no delete button in sight. It’s possible in my sexual universe for someone to be so unattractive it comes back around to sexy, so I decided to think of him in those terms. Maybe I could get into the “dirty old man ravaging my nubile young body” angle of the whole thing.
I had put in a lot of prep work after all – he’d sent me an email questionnaire compiled of questions he asks “every person he touches,” like the date and result of my last HIV test, whether I had known exposure to the herpes virus, and even questions about HPV before people were talking about HPV. I know that asking these questions of your partner are a good thing, but if I’m being totally honest it annoyed the shit out of me. I mean, people are either going to be honest about their STDs or they’re not. If someone knows they have herpes and they don’t tell you right upfront, they’re not going to tell you when you ask them either. Either you’re asking to see test results, or you’re protecting yourself as if they have everything.
Then he’d insisted on a “5-minute chemistry check” at a nearby Starbucks before he invited me into his apartment. And now here he was staring wolfishly at me in his fucking sweatpants. “How old are you?” he asked leeringly, again making me feel as if he might be just gross enough to be hot. I wondered if he might ask to see my ID.
“Do you actually want to be here long enough to order coffee,” he said? “No,” I responded, anxious to get this over with. “Let me just soak you in,” he said, taking a deep, creepy breath. I guess it went well, cause his next words were, “I don’t sense any kind of evil from you.”
“Yeah, I’m not evil really at all,” I responded.
Lack of evil thus confirmed, we went up to his apartment, where he made sure to greet the doorman as we walked past. In the elevator he told me that in every Law and Order episode when someone gets killed they talk to the doorman, which was why he’d made sure to get his attention as we went up. Yeah, I’m sure you didn’t just want him to see you with a hot piece of ass for once, I thought to myself, although sizing him up, I did think I could take him. “I like a girl who looks like she could kick my ass,” he confirmed my mental narrative.
Upstairs he took me on the tour and pointed out the complementary color schemes in the paintings and sculptures in his room. Then he sat me on a chair and told me to take off my shoes, which I did. Coming up behind me, he started to rub my shoulders, which felt pretty good. Far be it from me to sneeze at a free massage. He asked me to stand up and take off my skirt, then slipped his hand into my panties and slid his fingers across my inextricably slick clit. Even when I don’t think I’m turned on or I don’t like the guy I’m with, I get very wet. When I am into it, I get so soaked my thighs stick together.
“Stare straight ahead,” he told me, “and don’t look anywhere else no matter what I do.” My panties rested around my knees as he moved behind me and rubbed something soft and warm against my ass.
“Do you know what that is?” he asked. I had a guess.
He pulled my top off, gasping a little as my tits fell out of my shirt. He pushed me to my knees and slipped on a condom on, and told me to put my hands behind my back. He asked if he could tie them there, but I declined. The last thing I needed was to be immobilized in a stranger’s apartment. He told me to take him all the way down my throat. “Every time you gag, I’m going to slap you,” he said, but let’s just say I didn’t expect to get slapped.
In description, this scenario sounds kind of hot but in actuality it was strangely stilted and unsexy. He didn’t seem to be particularly turned on, more like he was going through the motions.
He instructed me to lay on his bed. There were two straps of fabric attached to his bed that Velcro-ed in the middle, across my legs. I allowed it because I could easily slip my legs out from under it if he came at me with an axe or something. He sat in a chair at the foot of the bed and instructed me to masturbate. I laid back and squeezed my eyes shut, rubbing my clit and imagining a scenario in which I was turned on, which he immediately called me out on.
“Look at me while you do it,” he said. “I want to feel connected to you.”
Craning my neck up to look into his eyes, I circled my clit with my index and middle fingers and squeezed my nipples with my other hand. He watched without touching himself and gave the occasional instruction, asking me first to suck on my index finger, then to stick it up my ass while I played with myself. He went to the closet and pulled out a huge canvas bag of toys.
I consider myself pretty toy-savvy; I’ve written for enough small feminist press to be paid in vibrators, and I wouldn’t want my grandma opening up my nightstand drawer. But I didn’t even know if some of the things he pulled out were for the ass or the vagina. When he pulled out the latex gloves, I checked the clock and told him we only had 10 minutes left (which I NEVER do, I usually prefer to focus on the customer’s satisfaction over the clock). He sighed, but dutifully began to repack his sex pervert bag.
“How about a quick fuck?” he asked me. Agreeing, I jerked him off for awhile, but his cock wouldn’t get hard enough to slip a condom on and there was no way I was humping his half-mast cock with a condom propped on top like a loose-fitting party hat. “Let’s just masturbate together,” I cooed, laying next to him and staring at his flaccid cock as he jerked off and fingering myself like it was the hottest thing I’d ever seen.
Meanwhile, my thought process went something like “Please cum please cum hurry up please cum my mouth tastes like latex I hope he cums soon I’m gonna buy a pack of gum when I get out of here I’ll have money once he pays me please cum don’t look at his rotted tooth I can’t wait to get out of here…”
I think it speaks to the miraculous ability of the human body to function independently of the mind that I had an orgasm even before he did.
Friday, August 3, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
36 comments:
I think I cum faster when I am not having the best time, when I just want to be done cause I have shit to do.
It's funny that the reaction is something like, "damn you came fast, I guess I'm just that good."
Damn, girl, you are a total pro. I would not be able to hide my disgust. Have you ever turned a guy down after you met him and decided he was too ugly/creepy/crazy?
I love your blog.
Here's what's weird about this guy (well, other than the obvious stuff): He starts off treating you like your feelings don't matter at all (maybe you're evil, he needs to assess you, etc.). I'm reading it thinking some guys must feel like they can totally dehumanize you in the situation -- same way some rude people to do other service employees. But then, later on, he wants you to look at him because he wants to "feel connected" to you. It's a weird contradiction.
Your oportunity came and went right at the beginning, when he approached you on the street. You could have just said "no", that you're not college callgirl and walked away. Because, and correct me if I'm wrong here, it doesn't seem like this guy ever transitioned to the so-ugly-he's-hot category.
Love you blog! Not only is it very entertaining but you're an exccellent writer.
eric:
No, he never made the transition. But I thought he might!
you've got the bionic pussy CCG. how could have ever blown a load in this scenario? damn!
LOL.. you're a brave, brave girl.. I'm not sure I could've stuck around for him.
Love your blog!
It's sad that said hot scenario was wasted on this urgly man.
Sigh.
I think you should have left at some point. No money is worth a nasty old man with latex gloves. Because the whole latex gloves thing reeks of murder. Am I right?
If an orgasm is the release of tension and discomfort, and sexual tension and discomfort in men manifests in an erection -- why doesn't a single old-guy who can't get an erection simply enjoy in his freedom? Or at least spend the extra $10 for the Viagra?
I'm a regular reader and I'm not trying to be harsh but "inextricably" is used incorrectly. It's incorrect if you're not trying to free yourself from your slick clit. You probably just wanted a fancier word than incredibly, but it didn't quite work.
That guy was a weirdo, but then...are all guys who pay for sex weirdos? Interesting discussion point there.
CCG seems to think dudes who pay for sex are the normal ones who want to save their relationships/mariages by not having an extramarital affair.
Oh my god, I love this blog SO MUCH. Seriously, that post was just fantastic.
ewwwww. i wouldve been done after the whole 'evil' thing.
Shit, you really do get some weird guys. Men are funny buggers. I enjoy sex way too much to hump one in trackpants. Ugh - that alone would put me off right there ! Keep it up, I love your Blog :-) K
reason #358 why I couldn't be a CG. I would have mouthed off to a man giving me all those damn demands in the bedroom...
MsP
Oops, I meant "inexplicably."
I think he feels a bit guilty about doing what he did with all the questions, etc...lol. Makes you wonder!!
http://www.rude.com/brainswitbeauty
That guy was a weirdo, but then...are all guys who pay for sex weirdos?
Jung dismissed the notion of holding people to the non-existent standard of "normal." He used the analogy of a bed of pebbles, saying that while the pebbles may average 1.4 grams, that average does not depend on any of the pebbles weighing 1.4 grams.
Of course the guy wasn't normal -- there is no normal.
You tell a hell of a story! Writing skills, on top of your professional acumen. Very hot.
I just figured you meant "inexorably" - i.e., no matter what, your clit's always slick.
Man, I don't know how you do this for a living? Aren't you scared?
I would have to bring along a weapon if I did this kind of work.
Plus you stick with it.Do you know beforehand, that he was into kinky bondage like things? Or do you walk into these situations,and take it as it comes? Just wondering. You better be careful,that's all.I don't know you,but I worry about you.
Stephanie
your blog is Fantasmic.
and i have just added you to my list of the blogs that I truly think are amazing.
because its amazing.
mike:
Jung may have been well served by re-taking statistics.
The term "normal" when used colloquially usually refers to the "mode" of the cultural population, not the "mean". So while yes, the mean of the stones might be 1.4g if you have a handful of sand and a few boulders, the mode is going to be the weight of a grain of sand. Because the "normal" rock in that grouping is a grain of sand, not the freakishly large boulders.
So, in fact, normal does exist, but I have my doubts that you or I, or even anyone reading this blog, fall under its application.
Josh, Jung wasn't a statistician, and I think the writings of his I'm referring to were translated to English. He presented his analogy to criticize the excuse fascism is normal in the fascist state. What you are saying doesn't seem to disqualify what I've said.
I was responding to a comment that people who paid for sex are abnormal. Jung's analogy applies in that qualifying as normal does not disqualifies behavior as repulsive, and deviancy from normal does not validate behavior as repulsive. That's all.
mike:
I know Jung wasn't a statistician. That was a "psych joke."
As for the concept of normal, I was just clarifying that the analogy used does not discount the existence of normal.
I think the larger concept you're taking issue with is the indefinite bounds of implied relativity.
The term "normal" is seldom accompanied with a specified reference. In this case, the poster did not specify "Men who pay for sex are abnormal compared to everyone in New York City," or "Men who pay for sex are abnormal compared to forty-something guys in tracksuits that live alone and spend a lot of time on Craigslist." Additionally, the term when a reference is unspecified is further complicated by the inferred reference as attributed by a reader. Someone in Las Vegas might look at that statement and think "what's that poster smoking?" whereas a nun might nod her head in grim approval (and I might add, the image of nunnery reading this blog sends giggles down my spine).
And yes, the concept of normal and repulsive are not at all tied together. Repulsive is entirely relevant to the individual, and generally highly influenced by their society during their formative years; whereas "normal" is entirely relevant to the society of the object at the time of its manifestation.
Finally, just to play devil's advocate to your defense of fascism and prostitution: "Down with the facist whoremongers! It's high time we embrace socialism and free love for everybody!"
Hi CCG,
Obviously your self-preservation radar is heightened, and probably you're an expert at reading people, body language, etc., because in this situation how does an inexperienced young woman discern a lonely anti-social fella who's most likely intimidated by her and also suffering a level of self loathing and the same kind of fella who'd actually harm her?
I read your blog often, CCG, and always experience a combination of concern, shock, and admiration.
Take care of yourself.
As for the concept of normal, I was just clarifying that the analogy used does not discount the existence of normal.
About 2,500 years ago, Lao Tzu opened the Tao te Ching by saying that the way that can be spoken is not the true way, and continued to say that a finger pointing at the moon is not he moon and cannot draw the moon towards the pointer, underscoring that that which is representational is not interchangeable with that which it represents. In this same manner, the 20th Century's Magritte painted his "this is not a pipe" painting.
Literally speaking, there is no such thing as normal.
The term "normal" is seldom accompanied with a specified reference.
I don't consider the shortcomings of a non-existent standard the fault of that which is real.
In this case, the poster did not specify "Men who pay for sex are abnormal compared to everyone in New York City," or "Men who pay for sex are abnormal compared to forty-something guys in tracksuits that live alone and spend a lot of time on Craigslist."
Nothing I've said depends on inferring any of that from what the poster had said.
Additionally, the term when a reference is unspecified is further complicated by the inferred reference as attributed by a reader.
As Goethe said: optical illusion is optical truth. The foundation of our interaction with our external environment is inference.
Someone in Las Vegas might look at that statement and think "what's that poster smoking?" whereas a nun might nod her head in grim approval (and I might add, the image of nunnery reading this blog sends giggles down my spine).
You've lost me in what you are referring to as "that statement."
And yes, the concept of normal and repulsive are not at all tied together. Repulsive is entirely relevant to the individual, and generally highly influenced by their society during their formative years; whereas "normal" is entirely relevant to the society of the object at the time of its manifestation.
"entirely relevant to the society of the object at the time of its manifestation" because normal is only real as representation, and not literally.
But, as demonstrated by the fact all innovation depends on the disobedience of convention, society does not have to depend on normalcy. Peace does not have to depend on conformity. It can depend on tolerance of diversity.
I don't know why you are responding to what I say as if anything I say is to be challenged.
Finally, just to play devil's advocate to your defense of fascism...
You are attributing to me things I literally have never said. There is no defense against a hidden agenda.
"...free love for everybody!"
Where there is consent, there is no need for entitlement. Where there is no consent... that's very, very bad.
Wow. This is actually one of the most depressing things I've ever read...
How many years of abuse did you suffer growing up?
OMG, I have soooo been there. I did outcalls for a few years (I was my own manager by the way) in my twenties, I am 41 now and I swear I must have had this same exact client!! Too funny. You bring back the memories without the guilt. You go girl.
It's pretty funny that a discussion of Jung started up in the comments. Pretty impressive.
Ummmm... how to say this? This entry pretty much led me to decide never to have sex again. I'd rather be celibate for the rest of my life than be thought of-- or described --like the client here. I don't wear sweatpants, and I'd never wear mandals. But after this... I'd be too ashamed ever to be with a girl again, even a professional.
G'luck out there! Be safe and strong!
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品
Post a Comment